I wonder dear reader if you have even thought of or considered some of the more bizarre results of the "war on terrorism"? Did you know that the Kurds of Turkey, the Muslims in China, the separatists in the Philippines, the Chechens in what was previously the "Evil Empire" are now all terrorists? In fact any group that opposes the government in power, regardless of that governments legitimacy or human rights record is now labeled terrorist, and the international war against terrorism is enjoined against them. Seems to me that this is very convenient for the powers in control.

The reason for this is blatantly obvious; king George wants legitimacy for his planned war, he wants support for it, by aligning our national position against opposes of the status quo he gets recognition from those governments as well as their support. In some cases that's not altogether bad in others it's a disaster. Consider the case of the PRC (Peoples Communist Republic of China) in the week of Sept 15 we, the United States for the first time recognized Islamic (religious) opposition to the most repressive government in the world as terrorists. Now think of the Chechens they have fought the Russian Empire for over one hundred years Stalin killed millions of them and deported more millions to Siberia, we have now aligned ourselves with the Russian oppressors for political expediency.

Not by any means to be overlooked my friends, is the "war on drugs" an effort on which we have to date wasted over a trillion dollars, and now has us involved in a war in Columbia. And then there's the "war on poverty" (the great society) another boondoggle that since it's inception by LBJ has cost over two trillion without any noticeable by percentage of population decrease in poverty. All these are political actions for the sole purpose of increasing socio-political dependency class.

Should I point out to you my fellow citizens that all these wars have a common thread? Do you realize that with every one of these wars our liberties and freedoms have been infringed upon? Are you aware that the most recent act the American Patriot Act violates the constitution as well as numerous of the first ten amendments thereto? This bad, what can only be called Orwellian legislation past through congress with only one dissenting vote. Are you cognizant of the fact that our individual freedoms, the liberty our forefathers fought so hard to attain, our constitutionally guaranteed rights are being stripped away? Do you understand that Adam Weishaupt's ten principles as plagiarized by Karl Marx in his London published Das Komunitische Manifest are being implanted before your eyes? As Jefferson said: "Those who prefer safety over liberty and security over freedom are not entitled to either" The recent acts in the Middle East as well as in America are rapidly reaching frightening proportions, while our government in the name of protecting its citizens embarks on a war against an elusive and to date unidentified enemy. A war as was Viet Nam without any end in sight, and with undefined goals. This war has become a convenient means by which the elites have instituted draconian legislation, not in protection of the citizens but instead to increase the illegitimate power of the state, by trampling on the peoples rights, their constitution and bill of rights.

I'm sorry to be the bearer of bad tidings, but will not shirk my responsibility in pointing out to you that these action taking place in America are being duplicated in the EC, and all over the world. The same sort of constitutional violations are being foisted on the people of England, Switzerland, France, in fact in every one of the developed nations. For anyone to think that these matters are unrelated is sheer folly. There is in fact an organization that functions worldwide and is the originator of all these actions designed to push the world into one world government. That organization is the Bilderbergers. They just concluded one of their meetings at a very posh resort in Chantilly VA, I'm confident your local newspaper or TV station had prominent coverage of the event ­ or didn't they? Let's consider just a small sampling of attendees, and then you can perhaps explain to me why there was a total media blackout, as there always is, at least in America. Some listed USA attendees were Allan Greenspan, Clara Hills, Kay Bailey Hutchinson, Henry Kissiger, Charles Krauthammer, Terry McAuliffe, David Rockefeller, Donald Rumsfeld, George Scoros, enough said about American attendees, anyone of knowledge will recognize all these names. As for foreigners how about; the Chairmen of: Société Générale de Belgique (National Bank of Belgium) Gerhard Randa National Bank of Austria, Charles Baillie TD Canada, Jorma Ollia CEO of Nokia, Hilmar Kopper Deutsche Bank, Jean-Calude Trichet Banque de France, Eric Roll UBS Wartburg. In addition there were numerous editors of major news agencies including the Washington Post, New York Times, Wall St Journal, Le Figaro, Der Spigel and so forth. Now do try again to explain to me how it is possible for a meeting to take place in Virginia composing a membership that controls two thirds of the world's wealth and most of the media and is not reported in a single mainstream news source. In fact to my knowledge the only source in America that informed about the meeting was American Free Press.

Anyone who actually still thinks that we have a free press in America must be comatose. Therein lies one of the secrets of control. There are three newsmagazines that cover the American market with circulation figures and ownership these are:

Time 4.1 million Time Warner Communications (Gerald Levine)
Newsweek 3.2 million Wash. Post Syndicate (Catharine Graham)
US News & World Report 2.3 million Mortimer Zuckerman

Please note all three are Jewish owned, which makes for very objective reporting on Middle East issues.

In fact the entire American mainstream media is owned and controlled by the following four companies:

Walt Disney Co. The big gorilla $53 billion market capitalization (David Eisner)
Viacom Murray Rothstein (real name Summer Redstone)
Rupert Murdoch News Corp. Rupert Murdoch
Universal Segrams Edgar Bronfman (world Jewish Congress pres.)

Any local newspaper or TV or radio station subscribes to news wire services for their national and international news. Here again we are presented with another stifling bit of information in that all the wire services available consist of:

AP UPI Reuters The New York Times syndicate and the LA times syndicate and that's all there is, they provide all the "news that they censure" to every news source in America.

So how balanced can your news be when we are restricted to four owners of information dissemination and only five wire services? In newsprint it's worse! Of the approximately 1500 American newspapers less than 300 are independently owned. That means that editorial policy for all the other 1200 newspapers is centrally made, and content as well as direction is dictated from some far away central operational headquarters. Since all the aforementioned news and media moguls are members of the Bilderbergers you won't soon read about their antics in any source that they control.

The most recent Bilderberger meeting had a topic of major impact on us all. The plan was unveiled that the EURO currency when it attained expansion to the new eastern European nations and acceptance by England and Denmark would be pegged to the dollar. This would in fact create a world currency giving the UN the ability for a worldwide taxation system. To these ends three tax options were discussed: 1) Fossil fuel tax on oil at the wellhead (10 US cents per gal.) 2) currency transfer tax on all funds moving between nations, (1.5% of transfer amount) 3) A surcharge on all international travel (2% of ticketed price). Now as is said Cui bono? All proceeds are to go to the UN. The rapid development of the Pacific Rim was seen as reason to expand the Asian-Pacific Union into the third conglomeration of nations. Shades of Orwell's 1984.

The end plan for this century then is; an expanded European Union with its currency the Euro pegged to the dollar. An expanded NAFA into the planned FTAA encompassing all of North and South America as well as the Caribbean Basin utilizing the dollar and pegged to the Euro. And third an Asian-Pacific Union comprised of western Pacific Rim nations also with their own currency but also pegged to the Euro and the Dollar. In one fell swoop we have a world currency, world taxation and world government. In his over 1500 page book Tragedy and Hope published in 1996 Professor Carroll Quigley, who was Bill Clinton's mentor at Georgetown University wrote: "Our aim is nothing less than to create a world system of finance control in private hands to dominate the political system of each country, and the world economy as a whole. Freedom and choice will be controlled within very narrow alternatives". All what are called "national banks" including the Bank of England, the Deutsche Bundesbank, Banka de Lavoro Nazionale, and our own Federal Reserve System are all private banks.

The FRS is not federal not a reserve and not a system but is in fact a corporation owned just over 50% by the big NY banks and the balance by the twelve FR banks. So you're skeptical well listen to the answers provided by the head information officer of the FRS bank San Francisco Mr. Ron Supinski on Oct 2 1992 in an interview.

Q.- Mr. Supinski, does my country own the FRS?
A.- We are an agency of the government.
Q.- That's not the question..is it owned by the United States?
A.-It is an agency of the government created by congress.
Q.-Is the Federal Reserve a Corporation?
A.-Yes
Q.-Does my government own stock in that corporation?
A.-No, the stock belongs to the member banks.
Q.-Are the member banks private corporation?
A.-Yes.

Well folks there you have it,- in a nutshell,- the FRS is owned by the private banks, which are the members of the Federal Reserve System and are privately owned. Unfortunately it gets worse. We must now determine what the value of the money issued by the FRS is. As you will recall the system went belly up i.e. bankrupted in 1933. As a result FDR in 1933 closed all banks for two days and made it illegal for Americas to own gold. The reason was simple before 1933 all money issued by the FRS was either gold certificates or silver certificates. Due to the great depression people no longer trusted their fiat (paper) money and demanded the banks pay out in gold or silver, the banks simply ran out, that was the cause of the bankruptcies. So we have come a long way, from gold and silver certificates to fiat money backed by a federal reserve bank, look at a one-dollar bill to the left of the portrait the seal reads the FRS bank of (Richmond, SF NY or whatever) now look at a new bill as issued under the Clinton administration; note, that the bill is no longer issued by a bank but by the "System". Returning now to our interview;

Q.- Are Federal Reserve Notes backed by anything?
A.- Yes the assets of the FRS, but primarily by the power of the congress to tax the people.
Q.- Did you just say that the issued currency was backed by the ability of congress to tax?
A.-Yes
Q.- What is the current asset base of the SF FRS bank?
A.- We have 36 billion in assets.
Q.- Of what are those assets comprised?
A.- Gold and government securities.
Q.- How is the gold valued?
A.- I don't know? (I'm not surprised I don't suspect you are either.)
Q.- What portion of the asset base is gold?
A.- $1.6 billion
Q.- So you have 34.4 billion in government loan papers backing the outstanding
Issued fiat paper?
A.-Yes.

Let me make this abundantly clear and very simple. The government securities spoken of above are various government loan papers. These are Treasury Notes, Treasury Bonds, Savings Bonds and such. They are in fact promissory notes that guarantee to pay the bearer their full issued value plus a fixed interest quarterly. They in fact are government IOU's. How can an IOU be considered an asset that backs a currency? That my friends is one of the secrets of 'fractional reserve banking".

Understand this and understand it clearly the Steering Committee of the Bilderbergers is made up exclusively of "national bankers", with a few politicians thrown in for good measure. These people jointly are operating the world's largest Ponzi-scheme called fractional reserve banking. To fully understand how this works you must come to the realization that all national banks have interlocking directorships, and not one of them acts independently from another. That's right my friends our FRS is about 30% foreign owned, while the same is true of all the other national banks in the G7 nations. They even have a centralized loan bank of last resort (BIS) the Bank of International Settlements located in Basel Switzerland, look their stock up see how many shares you can afford. The development of fractional reserve banking can be delineated back to the Middle Ages when goldsmiths accepted for deposit, peoples gold in their vaults, and issued a receipt. Soon the goldsmiths reached the conclusion that receipts rather than gold were being exchanged and began making up receipts using them to pay bills etc. The obvious eventual outcome was more receipts than gold (more money than hard asset backing: fractional reserve goldsmithing). In those times they hung the goldsmiths, we call it inflation and reward the bankers with accolades and benefits.

When FRS went bankrupt in 1933, that year saw the fourth managed depression the first was in 1921 followed by '29, 33. In fact by 2000 we would have either depressions or severe recessions in '34, '39, '57, '69, '75, '81, '87, and '92 Ten orchestrated failures in 87 years of the banks existence. Not bad considering that the much touted system was set up according to it's founders to "stabilize the currency, markets, and to prevent bank failures".

When in 1933 FDR received a desperate call from the head of the board of governors of the FRS; "all the people are coming to the banks and demanding that we pay out their gold and silver certificates in hard asset, which we don't have" he said. To which FDR queried, "what happened to the gold and silver then"? The head of the FRS simply then told the president that they had been issuing fiat (unbaked paper money) since 1914. FDR shut down all the banks for two days, made it illegal for Americans to own gold, and paid a generous $ 32. Per ounce for all the gold confiscated from the people, gold with an actual value of about $67. at that time. Highway robbery would be the best description of that action. Now my friends think about it, ten depressions well actually 11 counting our present circumstance in a system we were told would stabilize the "markets".

Well what about bank failures? Remember the Savings and loan debacle of the Clinton administration over 850 bank failures, and who bailed them out? You did with your taxes. What was the result? The National bank the FRS eliminated over 800 of their competitors in a short five-year term. Now it should by this time be pretty plain to you that market values (the rise and fall of stock prices and the value of money) are not caused by the rise in prices, as the controlled media would have you believe. In fact all that reporting of unemployment, GNP, all of it is nothing but BS. The cost of goods has not changed in 2000 years.

If you lived in Rome in the year 100 and wanted a suite of clothes (toga) shoes (sandals) a belt you would have paid the equivalent of _ ounce of gold, amazingly that's just about exactly what you would pay today in gold _ oz. of gold is about $ 160. the price of a suit of clothes a belt and a pair of shoes. All price fluctuation in all markets is caused by the manipulation of the value of the currency (fiat money) through the volume of paper issued by the centralized national private banks. The only other factor is the balance of trade, i.e. the amount of foreign goods we import vs. the amount of domestic product we export.

We all know that those figures are truly frightening in just June of 2002 we had a trade deficit of over $32 billion. This is the result of "free Trade" the Trojan horse of the New World Order, in their systematic destruction of industrialized economies. This further deludes the value of the currency because sooner or later the trading partner will demand that we make good on the difference in gold, this in fact happens quarterly and results in further inflation of the outstanding fiat money through the reduction of whatever gold supply is left in the depository.

Now just exactly, my friends, who is it that set up this gigantic rip-off? In 1910 Senator Nelson Aldridge Rockefeller jointly with Paul Wartburg called together nine men for a very secret meeting, at the winter retreat of the very rich and very famous at Jekyll Island Georgia. The meeting at the Jekyll Island Club presented to the gathered group of bankers Paul Wartburg's plan for the FRS. Paul was a German banker whose brother Karl was the head of the German Reichsbank.

These nine men accounted in 1910 for one fourth of the entire worlds wealth. More than one member was closely associated with the Rothschild banking empire. They traveled to Jekyll Island on Rockefeller's private rail car. The meeting took just over a week and within three years, after one failed attempt the Federal Reserve act was law in December of 1913.

All the protective provisions for the currency and the people were stripped out by 1915. In fact over 100 changes to the congressionally past legislation of the Federal Reserve act have been instituted since its inception. Each and every one of them increasing the power of the bankers who own the system. All of those travelers from the New Jersey Railhead to Jekyll Island used alias names or only their first name. Two of them adopter the Right brothers names, because they claimed always to be right. J. P. Morgan, Abraham Andrews, all were present. If you visit the Jekyll Island club today, which is now owned by the State of Georgia, you can find a room on whose door is a brass plaque stating; " The American Federal Reserve was set up in this room".

Now let me make something perfectly clear; its not about banking, its not about politics, its about power and political control. It's about World Government.

The seeds for this mammoth conspiracy rest in 1776 Bavaria and a very elusive secret society called the Illuminati. Adam Weishaupt was the founder of Illumonism a philosophy based on the concept of world domination, through the use of a ten-point program. The first five points in brevity are:

Abolition of private property.
A heavy and graduated income tax.
Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
Confiscation of property
Centralization of banking and nationalization of currency.

Just in case these seem somewhat familiar I will point out to you that they are the very points that Karl Marx plagiarized in the aforementioned Communist Manifesto. I do hope you read those first five points carefully because our leaders have instituted them all. We do not own land in America; don't we pay rent (property taxes) to government, which if we are late in paying have the land taken away from us. Do we not have a heavy burdensome graduated income tax? Does the government not have a very heavy-handed collection agency (IRS)? Do we have an inheritance tax? Does the government not seize land at their will? (RECO act, eminent domain seizures, Drug seizures, DEA, and IRS seizures) Don't we have a centralized banking system with its very own collection agency?

The inherent evil of this system of usury, this incredible Ponzi scheme, is clearly revealed if we examine the mortgage industry. Let's consider a hypothetical case: You purchase some land for $20,000. and you want to build a house on it. You will build a house for $ 80,000. which includes all architectural fees licenses (taxes) etc. You go to the bank and ask for a mortgage, they tell you if you give them a 10% down payment on the mortgage they will go ahead, you opt for a thirty-year mortgage. Your total outstanding mortgage will be $ 78,000. Who do you suppose makes the most off this deal? The builder? The land seller? The government in fees? No, indeed the banker he will make over $ 140,000. on the outstanding $ 78,000 loan. But that's not correct; we know from actuarial data that most mortgages are converted within the first twenty years. All mortgages are front-loaded, i.e. you pay most of the interest in the first fifteen years and most of the principal in the last fifteen years. So actually whatever interest rate they claim to be charging you it's a lie, they are charging about double whatever that amount is.

Another case is the "national debt". I'm sure, my friends, that you have heard various economists and members of the FRS like Alan Greenspan, and others stating that it would be a disaster if the national debt were paid off. Think about this-is it a disaster if you are debt free? Is it a disaster if all your bills are paid up to date? This reveals the utter fallacy of any such statement. The national debt is created when politicians in order to buy your vote by offering more and more state largess (government programs, grants, services, and benefits) to buy your votes spend more money then is taken in through taxes. They then go to the FRS for a loan. The FRS however has no money only a checkbook. They come to the FRS office and ask for money the FRS officer says how much, they say $ 10 billion today. So he takes out his checkbook and gives them a check for that amount, out of a checkbook that has no balance. They go to the government printing office and print up $ 10 billion in new currency. In the mean time the FRS in order to back that newly issued money sells Federal Depository Notes, T-Bills, and other loan instruments at interest. That interest is paid by you the taxpayers; twice, once for the interest and once because those loan papers are tax except. Who makes the money? The Bankers. Exactly how much tribute do you pay monthly? It's not hard to figure out, check the interest paid on the national debt (about $24 trillion) annually. The amount of the interest payments is published in the budget of the United States. All you have to do is you divide the total interest (about _ of the federal budget) by 180 million the approximate number of taxpayers and then divide that number by 12 and you will know what you pay for tribute every month.

There is one more issue; who are the modern Illuminists? The answer to that rests in their initiation ceremony. The Illuminati developed a distinct and one may say unique and bizarre ceremony for the initiation of new candidates, called vandals. The initiation ceremony, which lasts many hours, takes place in a darkened room that has no windows. In New haven CT the home of Yale that is in the Tombs the home of The Order. The candidate who is chosen by a committee is placed naked into a coffin with a ribbon tied around his genial. He is then told to recite ever prevision he has thought of or committed in his life, the results are recorded, to be used at any later convenient time to blackmail any possible defector from The Order.

Frankly there is but one organization in America who utilizes this exact initiation ceremony, and that is The Order, also called Bones, 322, The Order of Death, it is a senor society at Yale University that initiates 13 new member every year. There are about 900 members active mostly employed in banking, law, media and government. Membership tends to follow family relationships, names of prominent family members are: Bush, Bundy, Buckley, Coffin, Cooper, Emerson, Gillman, Chaffe, Heinz, Harriman, Kerry, Lord, Luce, Rockefeller, Phelps, Pillsbury, Taft, Talbot, Weyerhaeuser, McLeach, I'm confident that you recognize at best three fourth of those names.

If you learn one thing from this article it should be that the One Worlders are all the agents of the international banking cartel. That the leadership of that cartel belongs to an organization called the Bilderbergers, and that the steering committee of the Bilderbergers are illuminists.

God save the Republic.

Copyright © 2000, 2001, 2002 - Adrian H. Krieg
All Rights Reserved

Page URL: http://www.kriegbooks.com/the_betrayal_of_nations.html
Host Web site: http://www.kriegbooks.com/